Jump to content

Talk:The Fullerton Hotel Singapore

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeThe Fullerton Hotel Singapore was a Art and architecture good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 23, 2014Good article nomineeNot listed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 8, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that there was a lighthouse on the roof of The Fullerton Hotel Singapore, which could be seen by ships 29 kilometres away?
[edit]

The text of this page is in violation of copyright laws. It has been directly copied from pages 74-75 of the book Singapore's 100 Historic Places which is copyrighted by Archipelago Press. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reaperducer (talkcontribs) 23:05, 27 July 2007

Resolved - page deleted and restubbed by User:Garion96 on 3 Sep 07. See also [1] --Rifleman 82 02:45, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
will be re-working on it. —Sengkang 02:48, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for page move

[edit]

Can I request the help of an administrator to move this article to its proper name "The Fullerton Hotel Singapore"? Thanks. —Sengkang 00:57, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:The Fullerton Hotel Singapore/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Peripitus (talk · contribs) 10:38, 23 April 2014 (UTC) I'm quick failing this article as there are three very significant issues. I have not reviewed it's comprehensiveness, accuracy or the appropriateness of references[reply]

  • The lead section is far too short and lacks most of the material it should contain- it has to summarise the article whereas this one is a two-sentence introduction
  • Writing style. The writing includes grammatical errors, convoluted sections and disjointed sentences.
  • "The height of its walls measures 36.6 metres (120 ft) from the ground". What else would they be measured from ? -> "Its walls are 36.6 metres (120ft) high"
  • "It spent close to another S$300 million converting Fullerton Building into a hotel and building the two-storey commercial complex One Fullerton opposite Fullerton Road" . Close to means the same as almost, where is opposite Fullerton road ? Does this all men "Almost S$300 million was spent converting the building into a hotel and on building One Fullerton, a two-storey commercial complex on the opposite side of Fullerton Road"
  • "The building has Neo-classical architectural features which include fluted Doric colonnades on their heavy base, and the lofty portico over the main entrance with trophy designs and the Royal Coat of Arms, crafted by Italian Cavaliere Rudolfo Nolli"… Did Nolli just craft the coat of arms or the whole building or the trophy designs and the coat of arms? A Collonade is a row of columns. Does this mean there is more than one row ? Does this mean "Collonades of heavy based Doric columns surround the building ?" "and the lofty" should be "a lofty"
  • "Architects 61, together with DP Consultants, was engaged to convert it into a 400-room luxury hotel. "The hotel rooms were designed by Hirsch Bedner Associates …. "were" not "was"….better as "Architects 61 and DP Consultants were engaged to convert it to a 400-room luxury hotel, using rooms designed by Hirsch Bedner Associates"
  • Too close paraphrasing in the article. In fact there are significant portions of the article that appear copied from the sources. These need to be extensively re-written. The changes to the text taken from the article's referenced are too minimal. Even some poor grammar has been copied across.
  • "The building's neo-classical columns and high-ceiling verandas were retained. It was clad in Shanghai plaster panels, which have been restored"
  • in http://www.historichotelsworldwide.com/hotels-resorts/the-fullerton-hotel-singapore/ "The Fullerton Hotel’s neo-classical columns and high-ceiling verandas have been retained, along with the beautiful Shanghai plaster panels"
  • "The owners converted the windows back to be housed in timber frames"
  • likewise in the reference "Even the windows were converted back to be housed in timber frames"
  • In that place "The grey Aberdeen granite building sits on 442,400 sq. feet of land, with its walls towering 36.58 m (120 feet) from the ground. The neo-classical architectural features include fluted Doric colonnades on their heavy base, and the lofty portico over the main entrance with trophy designs and the Royal Coat of Arms, crafted by Rudolpho Nolli"
  • In the article "The grey Aberdeen granite Fullerton Building sits on 41,100 square metres (442,400 square feet) of land. The height of its walls measures 36.6 metres (120 ft) from the ground. The building has Neo-classical architectural features which include fluted Doric colonnades on their heavy base, and the lofty portico over the main entrance with trophy designs and the Royal Coat of Arms, crafted by Italian Cavaliere Rudolfo Nolli. Originally, there were five distinct frontages, each treated in the Doric order. 14 elevators served the four floors plus the basement floors"


The article needs a complete check for copyright issues, rewriting or removing suspect sections, turning into better flowing prose and a lead section that summarises all of the article. - Peripitus (Talk) 10:38, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on The Fullerton Hotel Singapore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:55, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidate

[edit]

c:Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aerial perspective of Fullerton Hotel, Singapore.jpg--Editor-1 (talk) 07:26, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]